home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: winternet.com!grimmy!not-for-mail
- From: scottdo@winternet.com (Scott Olson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
- Subject: Re: 386BB Help
- Date: 21 Feb 1996 11:07:26 GMT
- Organization: StarNet Communications, Inc
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4geude$f0t@blackice.winternet.com>
- References: <19960215.75A2AF8.11DE3@weynet.demon.co.uk> <4g3p2r$gjs@news.azstarnet.com> <4g5f22$phg@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-66-34.dialup.winternet.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
-
- Brent Busby (claevius@prairienet.org) wrote:
- > krim@azstarnet.com wrote:
- > : They must be Static Column DRAMs, because 70 ns is precisely what you need
- > : for the BB at 25 Mhz, but of course in the Page Mode flavor. If they are
- > : Page Mode, then you really have a problem!
- >
- > I may be misunderstanding something, but, I thought the bridgeboard *favored*
- > the use of page mode memory, doesn't it? The Amiga native side, being a flat
- > memory Motorola based system likes static column, and the bridgeboard, being
- > Intel based with the infamous 640K/64K walls all over the place likes page
- > mode. Or does it? I have 8MB of uninstalled ZIPs that I haven't put in yet
- > that are *page* mode, so I certainly hope I'm right about this, because that
- > was very expensive... :-)
-
- You are correct, the Bridgeboard prefers page-mode ZIPs.
-
- Scott
-